Monday, May 11, 2009

Washington Post scolds Obama, praises Hoyer on Social Security

The Sunday Washington Post scolded President Obama for putting budget rhetoric over action, while praising House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) for daring to discuss Social Security reform:

"We can no longer afford to leave the hard choices for the next budget, the next administration or the next generation," declared President Barack Obama last week as he unveiled his budget. Well, yes, but that is exactly what he does. We just hope that it is only until the next budget rather than the next administration.

…That's one reason we were encouraged by a speech last week by House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.). On Social Security, the dreaded "third rail," he delivered a firm scolding to both parties: Democrats, for persistent demagoguery on the issue, and Republicans for refusing to countenance any mention of tax increases. He mentioned specific reforms such as cutting benefits, raising the retirement age and increasing taxes. That provides a far more helpful foundation for discussions than an insistence that only tax increases on the very rich are needed, as some members of his party suggest.

…Another local politician, Rep. Frank R. Wolf (R-Va.), has also pushed persistently for entitlement reform, championing a commission that would put all proposals on the table. In the Senate, Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) has courageously tried to get Social Security reform moving while showing a willingness to talk about both spending and revenue options, which is refreshingly realistic from a conservative Republican. Congress is not exactly bursting with members who are willing to face up to the stark realities created by our unending appetite for borrowing to fund the budget; too many members fall back on "we don't have a problem" or "no new taxes." But if the president means what he says about not delaying the hard choices, there are a number of politicians who seem ready to join him.

Click here to read the whole editorial.


 

1 comment:

Bruce Webb said...

"Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) has courageously tried to get Social Security reform moving while showing a willingness to talk about both spending and revenue options,"

Really? Has anyone actually talked about the revenue option of simply addressing this problem through phased in tax increases starting at 0.1% per year starting in 2028?

Except me and Coberly?
http://angrybear.blogspot.com/2009/05/mechanics-of-northwest-plan-for-real.html
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=ru4Qp28bP72l2gsRvR_-yGQ

We call it the 'Northwest Plan' because we live in the Northwest.