"Examining
the New Income Measures in the Current Population Survey"
EBRI Notes, Vol. 36, No. 5 (May 2015)
EBRI Notes, Vol. 36, No. 5 (May 2015)
The
U.S. Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey (CPS) is a primary source of
income data for those whose ages are associated with being retired. In response
to research showing that the survey has misclassified and underreported certain
types of income, the 2014 CPS included a redesigned set of questions aimed at
better capturing income from individual retirement accounts (IRAs) and
401(k)-type plans, among other goals. This paper provides a comparison of the
income levels from the redesigned questions with those from the traditional
questions. The focus in this paper is on the income of those ages 65 or older
and on the income categories associated with retiree income to see the impact
of the changes in the questions on sources of income in retirement. Particular
emphasis is given to the income from individual retirement accounts (IRAs) and
401(k)-type plans, as this appears to be the income type with the most
underreporting, given the lump-sum nature of the payments typically found from
these plans, instead of regular annuity payments traditionally received from
pensions. This analysis finds the new measure of income in the CPS identifies
significantly more income (and a much larger percentage of income) coming from
IRAs and 401(k)-type plans. Compared with the estimated amount under the
traditional-income questions for 2013, the redesigned questions have resulted
in an estimated total annual income 9.1 percent larger for those ages 65 or
older, an aggregate amount of almost an additional $133 billion. Retirement
income is 27.9 percent larger, an aggregate difference of almost $71 billion.
However, Social Security remains the overwhelmingly predominant source of
income for those ages 65 or older. The redesigned CPS still finds that over 60
percent of individuals in the two lowest-income quartiles receive more than 90
percent of their total income from Social Security.
BEN J. HEIJDRA, University of
Groningen - Department of Economics, CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and
Ifo Institute), Institute for Advanced Studies (IHS)
Email: b.j.heijdra@rug.nl
LAURIE S.M. REIJNDERS, University of Groningen
Email: lauriereijnders@gmail.com
Email: b.j.heijdra@rug.nl
LAURIE S.M. REIJNDERS, University of Groningen
Email: lauriereijnders@gmail.com
The
aim of this paper is to study the long-run effects of a longevity increase on
individual decisions about education and retirement, taking macroeconomic
repercussions through endogenous factor prices and the pension system into
account. We build a model of a closed economy inhabited by overlapping
generations of finitely-lived individuals whose labour productivity depends on
their age through the build-up of labour market experience and the depreciation
of human capital. We make two contributions to the literature on the
macroeconomics of population ageing. First we show that it is important to
recognize that a longer life need not imply a more productive life and that
this matters for the affordability of an unfunded pension system. Second, we
find that factor prices could move in a direction opposite to the one accepted
as conventional wisdom following an increase in longevity, depending on the
corresponding change in the age-productivity profile.
"Women's
Household Preparation for Retirement at Young and Mid-Adulthood: Differences by
Children and Marital Status"
Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Vol. 36 (2015)
Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Vol. 36 (2015)
CHRISTOPHER R. TAMBORINI,
U.S.
Social Security Administration
Email: Chris.Tamborini@ssa.gov
PATRICK J. PURCELL, U.S. Social Security Administration
Email: patrick.purcell@ssa.gov
Email: Chris.Tamborini@ssa.gov
PATRICK J. PURCELL, U.S. Social Security Administration
Email: patrick.purcell@ssa.gov
There
are increasing concerns about whether Americans are saving enough for
retirement. Recent research has called for improved understanding of the
relationship between family structure and economic preparation for retirement
at earlier stages of the life course. Using multiple years of the Federal
Reserve Board’s Survey of Consumer Finances, we examined how number of children
and marital status were associated with women’s household retirement savings at
young and mid-adulthood. Several household-level indicators of retirement
preparation were considered: desire to save for retirement, retirement account
ownership, eligibility to participate in a defined-contribution plan,
participation in defined-contribution plans, and retirement account wealth.
Results from regression analyses revealed variation in women’s household
financial preparation for retirement at young and mid-adulthood by family
context. Additional children were negatively associated with several measures
of retirement preparation among single-female households but not for couple
households. Overall, we found that low economic preparation for retirement is
an additional economic disadvantage facing single mothers at young and
mid-adulthood, with potentially long-term implications for their financial
security. The results shed light on linkages between family structure and
women’s economic status.
No comments:
Post a Comment