Thursday, December 9, 2010

Agenda for December 13-14, 2010 Technical Panel Meeting

2011 Technical Panel on Assumptions and Methods

Meeting Agenda

December 13-14, 2010

The meetings will be held in the offices of the Social Security Advisory Board:

400 Virginia Avenue SW, Suite 625, Washington, DC 20024

Monday, December 13, 2010

10:45-12:15 Short range assumptions and methods

Presenters: Office of the Chief Actuary

Disability and retirement over the short-range

Reconciling short and long-range methods and assumptions: beneficiary and benefit projections

12:15-1:00 Lunch

1:00-2:00 "Mortality at Older Ages: Why Has the US Fallen Behind Our Peers?"

Presenter: Dr. Samuel Preston, University of Pennsylvania

2:00-2:45 Mortality assumptions and methods

Presenter: by John Bongaarts, Panel member

2:45-3:00 Break

3:00-4:00 Discussion of mortality projections

4:00-5:00 Panel wrap-up

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

10:00-11:30 Long-range Economic assumptions and methods

    Presentation by Andrew Samwick, Panel member

11:30-12:30 Short range economic assumptions and methods

Presenters: Office of the Chief Actuary


 


 

Read more!

Social Security shuts down “restart” option

USA Today reports that the Social Security Administration has issued a regulation that effectively limits the option to "restart" Social Security benefits, which has increasingly been taken advantage of by financially-savvy retirees. The restart option allowed retirees to withdraw their application for benefits, repay the benefits they had received, the restart at a higher benefit level.

This strategy had two main advantages:

  • First, the repayment of benefits included no interest, making those benefits effectively an interest-free loan. For instance, a person who had claimed benefits $15,000 in annual benefits from age 62 through 70 could make around $15,000 on the deal, assuming a 3 percent interest rate.
  • Second, individuals who worried about dying before claiming benefits could claim at 62, then restart at later ages. This would give seniors the best of both worlds.

The regulation limits restarts to once in a lifetime and the restart must take place within 12 months of initial benefit claiming. Given these restrictions the strategy probably doesn't make much financial sense anymore, given the general hassle of visiting an SS office and running through the paperwork.

But it could allow someone who claimed at an early age then immediately decided to defer retirement another shot at doing so. There wouldn't be a direct financial benefit, but by delaying retirement the individual would assure themselves an higher benefit later in life and increased survivors' benefits for their spouse.

Read more!

Video of Chuck Blahous Social Security book event

On Monday the Heritage Foundation held an event based on the release of Chuck Blahous's excellence new book, Social Security: The Unfinished Work, available from fine booksellers everywhere (here's a link to Amazon).



You can watch the video of the event online here or over at Heritage's website.
Read more!

Wednesday, December 8, 2010

Raising the retirement age: pro and con

The Heritage Foundation's David John and the Center on Economic and Policy Research's Mark Weisbrot give the pros and cons of raising Social Security's retirement age at the Atlanta Journal Constitution. Click here to read.

Read more!

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

Jason Fichtner on Artificially Sweetened COLAs

The Mercatus Institute's Jason Fichtner – the former number 2 at Social Security – has a new policy brief on the social security COLA. Here's the background:

For the second year in a row, Social Security recipients will not receive a cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) increase to their monthly benefits. Social Security benefits only rise when prices go up; in years with low price inflation, they remain steady. And although low price inflation benefits all consumers, Congress has proposed to give every Social Security beneficiary a $250 check, which could cost taxpayers $15 billion.

While it might sound reasonable or fair to give seniors a boost during tough economic times, giving in to such demands would be misguided and undermine the very reason for tying cost-of-living adjustments to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) in the first place—to prevent yearly interest-group lobbying for higher benefit increases and, as the name implies, only provide an adjustment when there's an actual CPI-measured increase in the cost of living. Providing a COLA or one-time payment beyond what is warranted by an increase in the CPI would actually increase "real" benefits, artificially sweetening the COLA.

Check it out here.

Read more!

Wednesday, December 1, 2010

C-SPAN Video of AEI Event on the 112th Congress and the Economy

Here's a link to the panel I was on; sadly it's not embeddable. Also check out the first panel on how the health bill is being implemented; very interesting stuff that I hadn't know much about before.

Read more!

Allan Sloan’s Social Security Claims Are Turkey

Over at AEI's Enterprise Blog…

Read more!